The Web is more than its structure

BBC: The decaying web and our disappearing history

This is just one investigation, and a preliminary one at that. The figures, though, suggest a clear linear trend: the loss of just over 10% of the resources shared via social media each year, even when archiving is taken into account, or around 0.02% of this content lost every day.

Stories along these lines seem to surface at least once a year and seem to me to almost be accepted as truth. Curious, I decided to follow through to the original paper (you can tell I have a lot of things I should be doing when I start to check sources).

The news item is accurate in that the research is studying the decay of the web, or more accurately, the URI/URLs used to identify and link to pieces of information on the web.

However, just because URL may no longer be valid does not mean that the information no longer exists. It may simply have moved to another URL. Is this bad practice as far as web architecture goes? Yes. It is maintaining URL persistence always the highest priority for web development projects. No.

(I am certainly guilty personally and professionally of not making URL persistence a high priority for many of my web projects and sites. Something for me to work on.)

While URL persistence is a desirable goal, it isn’t necessary for the web to exist or for us to use it effectively. Web authors are constantly updating their links, and our search tools are constantly updating their indexes, and for the most part if the information still exists, we’re able to find it regardless of whether its URL has changed.

Now there is information that is disappearing from the web, some of it in huge chunks as hosting services shut down and web sites go offline. That IMHO is a far more important issue than link rot. It would be interesting to see some studies that look into that phenomenon. Thankfully we have the Internet Archive (currently offline as I write this!) and groups like the Archive Team who are working to preserve that information.

To say that the web is decaying it true, but it doesn’t provide a full or accurate picture of what is happening. There is as much if not more growth than decay. The content and structures of the web are being added to and modified continually. That the web is usable at all suggests that it is for the most part stable. Given the choice, I think we should focus our efforts on creating, improving, and preserving content, and issues with the structure will work themselves out.

Using technology to create connections between students and librarians

Like many academic libraries, we’re in the process of moving to a ‘single service point’ model in most (all?) of our branches, where instead of being scheduled to work at the reference desk librarians will be scheduled to be on call, only brought in if the question is one that requires a librarian’s assistance.

One of the risks of this change is that librarians will become further isolated from students. Out of sight, out of mind. This would be a problem if the reference desk was the primary means of interacting with students. While I do believe that the reference desk is a very important contact point, these days librarians have many more opportunities to contact and engage with students in ways that are potentially more meaningful and helpful for students.

Having said that, there is still a risk that librarians will retreat to their offices and focus on maintaining subject and course guides, on carrying out project work, committee work, research, writing, and getting published. All necessary things, of course, but ones which leave them invisible to the student population.

While librarians are clear on their responsibility to support students, this understanding may not be shared by students, as indicated by this quote [source] from a 2009 study of student behavior in and perceptions of academic libraries:

“Librarians are believed to do work unrelated to helping students, or work that, while possibly related to research, does not entitle students to relationships with them.”

All of the outreach work (or liaison work, as we call it) carried out by librarians helps to address this problem. Librarians who give information sessions during orientation or to specific classes are, in addition to teaching information literacy skills, helping to establish in students a more accurate perception of what librarians do and how they can help.

As a systems librarian, I don’t do much in the way of outreach. However, my team does have a major role to play in developing tools that librarians can use to interact with students in new ways. For example:

  • Our Library Blogs platform allows librarians to share updates, resources, and information seeking tips with their subject communities on an ongoing basis. These blogs can also give students a glimpse into the work of a librarian, and can show them how librarians are there to help them.
  • McGill’s new learning management system (Desire2Learn) has the potential of providing librarians with opportunities to interact with students directly in the context of their courses. We’re in the process of determining how best to accomplish this, specifically how to make course-specific resources available to students as efficiently as possible.
  • Librarian profile pages, not yet implemented on our site, can provide a richer online presence than our current listing of subject areas. Years ago (and before my time here) there was a concerted effort to reduce/remove the presence of librarians on the web site, and while at there may have been valid reasons for this approach, it is clear to me that we need to go in a different direction. Students, all people, are seeking human connections. Students want to interact with people, not with systems. Library profile pages will not only raise the profile of librarians on our site, but will provide students will a better understanding of who they are as librarians and as people.

These initiatives are just the beginning, and while none of them are on the cutting edge of librarianship, they are important initiatives that we’ve made a priority in our development plans. Anything we can do to establish a human presence on our web site will not only improve students’ perceptions of the website and the Library, but will also drive home to them that there are people here that are ready, willing, and able to help them succeed in their academic endeavors.

What tools do you think are most effective at creating connections between students and librarians? Share your thoughts in the comments below.